India has restored a key tariff advantage to local manufacturers that was snatched away
following a Supreme Court judgement, giving a boost to prime minister Narendra Modi's
phones, laptops and tablets will get a boost from this incentive, as will others such as
coal producers. The Central Board of Excise and Customs, the apex indirect taxes body,
has said only those manufacturing goods in India can enjoy a concessional 2% duty regime
without availing of tax credit on inputs, not importers who will have to pay 12.5%
countervailing duty.
However, mobile phone manufacturers assembling devices in the country with imported
inputs may not benefit so much from the government's move. "In case of mobile phones,
appropriate duty would need to be paid on inputs to be able to avail the benefit of
concessional rates on final products. Accordingly, assembly of parts alone may not be a
beneficial proposition," said Bipin Sapra, a partner at EY.
The government has been trying to encourage domestic manufacture of electronic goods
in view of large domestic market being serviced mainly by imports. India shipped in almost
$37 billion worth of telecom instruments, computer hardware and peripherals, electronic
instruments and components, and consumer electronics goods in FY15, a 14% rise over
the previous year. "If the said excisable goods are manufactured from inputs or capital
goods on which appropriate duty of excise leviable......"
Mobile phones attract excise duty of 1% and a 1% National Calamity and Contingency Duty
if no central value added tax (CENVAT) credit on inputs used is claimed, while a 12.5%
countervailing duty is levied on imported devices.
This gave a clear tariff advantage of 10.5% to local manufacturers. But the SC ruling in the
SRF case said importers would pay only 2% duty if they did not avail of CENVAT credit,
putting them on par with local manufacturers. The government has filed a special leave
petition against the decision but keeping in view the urgency of the situation, issued a
notification that will apply prospectively. For the period March to July, the decision of the
apex court on its petition would apply. Experts said.
没有评论:
发表评论